Budget SUV tyres were no match for Continental counterpart in comparative testing

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Plus
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Safety-conscious motorists ‘can’t ignore brand-name tyres’, that is the view of Continental tyres following the publication of a comparative test of ten budget SUV tyres conducted by Auto Bild Allrad magazine.

Continental vs budget SUV tyres

The test, which used the German tyre manufacturers ContiCrossContact UHP as a reference tyre, confirmed its clear superiority, according to Continental, which stated: “None of the tested models matched the Continental tyre, which was utilised as reference tyre, in safety-relevant performance. Once again, the Far Eastern products possessed significant weaknesses.”

According to Tyres and Accessories, for its June issue, Auto Bild Allrad’s test team evaluated ten size 235/55 R17 tyres from China and Taiwan, using a VW Tiguan as test vehicle. Wet, dry and off-road performance was put under the microscope in a total of 13 criteria.

Commenting on the results, Continental stated: “The Asian products showed weaknesses in all areas, and their driving performance failed particularly in the wet. The manufacturer points out that the worst performing tyre in the wet braking test (from 100km/h) stopped some 13 metres – three car lengths – after the ContiCrossContact UHP. And it says dry asphalt and off-road testing also showed up clear differences between the Chinese tyres and the product developed by Continental’s R&D department.

Tyres and Accessories concluded: “Perhaps rubbing salt into the wound, Continental notes that the Auto Bild Allrad experts described one of the “Chinese tyres in the test” as having “lousy levels of grip in the dry and wet” and “dangerous load change reactions.” The message Continental believes should be drawn from the test is, it concludes, that “the test’s overall ranking records that safety-conscious drivers can’t ignore brand-name tyres.”

Denna Bowman, Head Office

Share and Enjoy